Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC held that under Sections 292B and 292BB of the Income Tax Act, the assessee cannot challenge the validity of a notice u/s 143(2) or assessment order u/s 143(3) after appearing in proceedings without raising objections. The procedural defect of not issuing notice by DCIT does not invalidate the assessment, as the notice substantially conforms to the Act's intent. The ITAT's order interfering with the assessment was set aside, affirming the tax authorities' jurisdiction and the assessment's legal validity.
HC held that under Sections 292B and 292BB of the Income Tax Act, the assessee cannot challenge the validity of a notice u/s 143(2) or assessment order u/s 143(3) after appearing in proceedings without raising objections. The procedural defect of not issuing notice by DCIT does not invalidate the assessment, as the notice substantially conforms to the Act's intent. The ITAT's order interfering with the assessment was set aside, affirming the tax authorities' jurisdiction and the assessment's legal validity.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.