Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
HC adjudicated the jurisdictional dispute regarding GST levy on university affiliation fees. The court determined that university's statutory affiliation activities do not constitute a commercial transaction under Section 7 of CGST Act. Fees collected for affiliation, PG registration, and convocation are regulatory in nature, lacking commercial intent, and therefore not amenable to GST. The court found no jurisdictional basis for the show cause notice, emphasizing that the university's primary educational function precludes treating incidental transactions as business activities. Consequently, the HC allowed the petition, invalidating the proposed GST demand on the university's regulatory fees.
HC adjudicated the jurisdictional dispute regarding GST levy on university affiliation fees. The court determined that university's statutory affiliation activities do not constitute a commercial transaction under Section 7 of CGST Act. Fees collected for affiliation, PG registration, and convocation are regulatory in nature, lacking commercial intent, and therefore not amenable to GST. The court found no jurisdictional basis for the show cause notice, emphasizing that the university's primary educational function precludes treating incidental transactions as business activities. Consequently, the HC allowed the petition, invalidating the proposed GST demand on the university's regulatory fees.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
