Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of CESTAT adjudicated a customs classification dispute involving Clear Float Glass. The tribunal determined the imported goods should be classified under CTH 7005 1090, consistent with prior precedent in a similar case involving the same company. The ruling affirmed the appellant's entitlement to Free Trade Agreement (FTA) benefits under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, subject to regulatory compliance. The tribunal rejected the revenue's classification under CTH 7005 2990 and invalidated the extended period for duty and penalty demands. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, establishing the correct tariff heading and preserving the appellant's customs duty benefits.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
