TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal for statistical purposes, remanding the case for re-examination. The tribunal found merit in the assessee's arguments that the CIT(A) passed a non-speaking order without thoroughly examining the case merits. Referencing the Supreme Court's guidance in AUDA's case, the tribunal emphasized the tax authorities' obligation to carefully scrutinize receipts, expenditure patterns, and contentions on a case-by-case basis. The order specifically noted the CIT(A)'s failure to consider the assessee's detailed submissions regarding the TV subsidy received from BCCI and the impact of registration cancellation under section 12A.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
