Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
HC allowed the petition challenging a tax order under Section 73(9) of CGST Act, 2017. The court found the original order non-speaking and procedurally defective, as the tax officer summarily dismissed the petitioner's reply without substantive reasoning. The order was set aside, directing the tax authority to reconsider the matter and provide a proper hearing to the petitioner, ensuring principles of natural justice are upheld. The decision emphasizes the requirement for reasoned, transparent administrative actions in tax proceedings.
HC allowed the petition challenging a tax order under Section 73(9) of CGST Act, 2017. The court found the original order non-speaking and procedurally defective, as the tax officer summarily dismissed the petitioner's reply without substantive reasoning. The order was set aside, directing the tax authority to reconsider the matter and provide a proper hearing to the petitioner, ensuring principles of natural justice are upheld. The decision emphasizes the requirement for reasoned, transparent administrative actions in tax proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
