Electricity network contributions remain revenue expenditure where ownership and maintenance stay with the electricity board, supporting business prof...
The HC quashed the cancellation of GST registration and rejection of revocation application, finding that respondents failed to provide valid justification for the cancellation. The court noted that the original cancellation order improperly imposed retrospective effect from August 3, 2017, despite no such indication in the original Show Cause Notice. Furthermore, the rejection of the revocation application without granting the petitioner a hearing violated Section 30 of the CGST Act and principles of natural justice. The court set aside the impugned SCN, order-in-appeal, original cancellation order, and the order rejecting the revocation application.
The HC quashed the cancellation of GST registration and rejection of revocation application, finding that respondents failed to provide valid justification for the cancellation. The court noted that the original cancellation order improperly imposed retrospective effect from August 3, 2017, despite no such indication in the original Show Cause Notice. Furthermore, the rejection of the revocation application without granting the petitioner a hearing violated Section 30 of the CGST Act and principles of natural justice. The court set aside the impugned SCN, order-in-appeal, original cancellation order, and the order rejecting the revocation application.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
