Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of CESTAT held that the appellant was ineligible for area-based exemption under N/N. 50/2003-CE. The Tribunal determined that M/s Stanley Controls was non-operational at the time of transfer, despite contrary claims. Evidence showed the transferor filed multiple quarterly returns on a single date just before takeover, reported inconsistent production figures, and showed nil production after transfer. The appellant failed to provide documentary evidence contradicting the finding that the transferor was defunct. CESTAT concluded that a facade of taking over a working unit was created solely to avail exemption benefits, emphasizing that CBEC Circular permits transfer of functioning units, not merely exemption entitlements. The demand for duty, interest, and penalties was upheld.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
