Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
HC held that cross-objections are not maintainable under Section 260A of the Act absent specific statutory recognition, unlike Section 253(4). A respondent's right under Section 260A(6)(b) is limited to advancing contentions on adverse Tribunal findings only if they are intrinsically connected to the substantial question of law in the admitted appeal. The provision is merely enabling and does not confer an independent right to raise challenges disconnected from the admitted question. While respondents may support ultimate decisions by pressing connected issues decided against them without separate cross-objections, they must pursue appropriate appellate remedies for unconnected grievances rather than filing cross-objections.
HC held that cross-objections are not maintainable under Section 260A of the Act absent specific statutory recognition, unlike Section 253(4). A respondent's right under Section 260A(6)(b) is limited to advancing contentions on adverse Tribunal findings only if they are intrinsically connected to the substantial question of law in the admitted appeal. The provision is merely enabling and does not confer an independent right to raise challenges disconnected from the admitted question. While respondents may support ultimate decisions by pressing connected issues decided against them without separate cross-objections, they must pursue appropriate appellate remedies for unconnected grievances rather than filing cross-objections.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
