Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC allowed the appeal regarding determination of property acquisition date for capital gains calculation. The court held that transfer date should be considered as allotment date (1.8.2006) rather than agreement registration date (18.3.2008). The ruling established that property rights accrued to assessee upon allotment, evidenced by initial payment made before allotment and subsequent adherence to payment schedule. HC emphasized that 'transfer' under Income Tax Act should be interpreted distinctly from Transfer of Property Act, and allotment created direct interest in property. Matter remanded to AO for reassessment considering 1.8.2006 as transfer date.
HC allowed the appeal regarding determination of property acquisition date for capital gains calculation. The court held that transfer date should be considered as allotment date (1.8.2006) rather than agreement registration date (18.3.2008). The ruling established that property rights accrued to assessee upon allotment, evidenced by initial payment made before allotment and subsequent adherence to payment schedule. HC emphasized that 'transfer' under Income Tax Act should be interpreted distinctly from Transfer of Property Act, and allotment created direct interest in property. Matter remanded to AO for reassessment considering 1.8.2006 as transfer date.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
