Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
NCLAT held that fund infusion by appellant into corporate debtor qualified as financial debt under IBC Section 5(8), despite absence of explicit interest clause. Following Orator judgment, tribunal confirmed that interest-free loans aren't excluded from financial debt definition. Time value of money was evidenced through commercial benefits and enhanced economic prospects expected by appellant. Tribunal found error in lower authority's characterization of transaction as mere business arrangement. Matter remanded to adjudicating authority to determine if default threshold met for Section 7 admission. Key amount claimed in default: Rs.42,47,32,067 including interest on principal loan of Rs.39,84,72,111 advanced as financial assistance.
NCLAT held that fund infusion by appellant into corporate debtor qualified as financial debt under IBC Section 5(8), despite absence of explicit interest clause. Following Orator judgment, tribunal confirmed that interest-free loans aren't excluded from financial debt definition. Time value of money was evidenced through commercial benefits and enhanced economic prospects expected by appellant. Tribunal found error in lower authority's characterization of transaction as mere business arrangement. Matter remanded to adjudicating authority to determine if default threshold met for Section 7 admission. Key amount claimed in default: Rs.42,47,32,067 including interest on principal loan of Rs.39,84,72,111 advanced as financial assistance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.