Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
HC set aside respondent's order concerning input tax credit under Section 16(4) of CGST Act, 2017. The matter was remanded back to respondent No.7 for fresh consideration in accordance with amended Section 16 provisions. The authority must provide petitioner opportunity for hearing and issue new determination within two months from certified order copy production. Court's intervention focused on procedural compliance and fair hearing requirements under GST framework, particularly regarding time extension for passing orders under Section 73 and proper adjudication of input tax credit claims.
HC set aside respondent's order concerning input tax credit under Section 16(4) of CGST Act, 2017. The matter was remanded back to respondent No.7 for fresh consideration in accordance with amended Section 16 provisions. The authority must provide petitioner opportunity for hearing and issue new determination within two months from certified order copy production. Court's intervention focused on procedural compliance and fair hearing requirements under GST framework, particularly regarding time extension for passing orders under Section 73 and proper adjudication of input tax credit claims.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
