Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of ITAT upheld the reopening of assessment under s.147 as it was based on new facts not previously available to the AO, rejecting assessee's claim of mere 'change of opinion.' Regarding bogus purchases from six entities, ITAT confirmed CIT(A)'s approach of quantifying profit at 10% GP rate (less 1.53% already disclosed), sustaining addition of Rs. 1,22,08,002. CIT(A) reasonably estimated profits based on prevailing GP rates in rice miller/trader business for goods procured from grey market rather than bogus entities. On unaccounted investments, ITAT affirmed AO's addition based on 'peak purchase' amount appearing in bogus concern's account, considering it represented unexplained investment in bogus billing operations.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
