Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s deletion of multiple additions made against the assessee regarding unaccounted money lending, payments, jewellery, and chit fund transactions. The tribunal found that substantive additions were correctly made in M/s Bulland Buildtech Pvt. Ltd.'s hands, not the assessee's. Ancestral jewellery was within CBDT prescribed limits. Personal expenditure was justified from own funds without evidence of undisclosed income. Cash balance of Rs. 1,62,000 was properly declared. Payments related to M/s Bulland Leasing and Finance Ltd. for AY 2007-08 couldn't be added in AY 2011-12. Revenue's appeals were dismissed due to tax effects below monetary limits per CBDT Circular No.17/2019. All grounds raised by revenue were rejected, ruling in assessee's favor.
ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s deletion of multiple additions made against the assessee regarding unaccounted money lending, payments, jewellery, and chit fund transactions. The tribunal found that substantive additions were correctly made in M/s Bulland Buildtech Pvt. Ltd.'s hands, not the assessee's. Ancestral jewellery was within CBDT prescribed limits. Personal expenditure was justified from own funds without evidence of undisclosed income. Cash balance of Rs. 1,62,000 was properly declared. Payments related to M/s Bulland Leasing and Finance Ltd. for AY 2007-08 couldn't be added in AY 2011-12. Revenue's appeals were dismissed due to tax effects below monetary limits per CBDT Circular No.17/2019. All grounds raised by revenue were rejected, ruling in assessee's favor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
