Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
HC invalidated provisional attachment of petitioner's bank account under Section 83 of MGST Act 2017. Court emphasized the draconian nature of provisional attachment powers, requiring strict fulfillment of statutory conditions and proper formation of Commissioner's opinion to protect revenue interests. The Joint Commissioner's order failed to demonstrate adequate material basis for concluding petitioner would defeat potential tax demands. The mere reference to GST Council's recommended amendment regarding "plant and machinery" terminology in Section 17(5)(d) was insufficient justification. Court found the attachment unjustified due to lack of substantive reasoning and evidentiary support. Petition disposed of with attachment order quashed.
HC invalidated provisional attachment of petitioner's bank account under Section 83 of MGST Act 2017. Court emphasized the draconian nature of provisional attachment powers, requiring strict fulfillment of statutory conditions and proper formation of Commissioner's opinion to protect revenue interests. The Joint Commissioner's order failed to demonstrate adequate material basis for concluding petitioner would defeat potential tax demands. The mere reference to GST Council's recommended amendment regarding "plant and machinery" terminology in Section 17(5)(d) was insufficient justification. Court found the attachment unjustified due to lack of substantive reasoning and evidentiary support. Petition disposed of with attachment order quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
