Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee regarding multiple contribution-related disputes. The Tribunal upheld the one-time superannuation fund contribution made to bridge actuarial valuation gaps, determining that ceiling rules were inapplicable as it wasn't an initial or annual contribution. Similarly, excess contribution to approved gratuity fund was allowed, following precedent that recognition status must be presumed valid until explicitly withdrawn by Commissioner. Additionally, the Tribunal deleted disallowances under s.36(1)(va) regarding delayed provident fund deposits, noting that absent specific due dates in KPT Regulations 1988, contributions credited within the following month were acceptable. The Revenue's appeals on all grounds were dismissed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
