Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC declined to address allocation of undisclosed Shilpgram Scheme income between parties as factual matter, upholding Tribunal's 70-30 split. On interest charges under s.158BFA(1), court affirmed Tribunal's ruling that assessee could not be charged interest for delayed return filing during period when seized documents were unavailable. Court determined interest charges inappropriate until photocopies of seized materials were provided to assessee, as compilation of return was impossible without access to these documents. Question regarding income allocation dismissed as factual; interest charge question resolved in assessee's favor.
HC declined to address allocation of undisclosed Shilpgram Scheme income between parties as factual matter, upholding Tribunal's 70-30 split. On interest charges under s.158BFA(1), court affirmed Tribunal's ruling that assessee could not be charged interest for delayed return filing during period when seized documents were unavailable. Court determined interest charges inappropriate until photocopies of seized materials were provided to assessee, as compilation of return was impossible without access to these documents. Question regarding income allocation dismissed as factual; interest charge question resolved in assessee's favor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
