Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
CESTAT allowed appeal concerning CENVAT credit disputes. Tribunal set aside demand of Rs.1,79,11,286 based on ST-3 returns and credit register differences, noting statutory compliance in utilizing 50% credit on capital goods. Demand of Rs.59,94,339 for input services was reversed as manpower services qualified as eligible inputs for telephonic services. Demand u/r 3(5A) for capital goods sold as scrap was invalidated as no CENVAT credit was originally claimed on pre-2004 goods. Extended limitation period was rejected considering regular ST-3 filing, departmental audits, and appellant's PSU status precluding mala fide intent. All demands were set aside and appeal was allowed in appellant's favor.
CESTAT allowed appeal concerning CENVAT credit disputes. Tribunal set aside demand of Rs.1,79,11,286 based on ST-3 returns and credit register differences, noting statutory compliance in utilizing 50% credit on capital goods. Demand of Rs.59,94,339 for input services was reversed as manpower services qualified as eligible inputs for telephonic services. Demand u/r 3(5A) for capital goods sold as scrap was invalidated as no CENVAT credit was originally claimed on pre-2004 goods. Extended limitation period was rejected considering regular ST-3 filing, departmental audits, and appellant's PSU status precluding mala fide intent. All demands were set aside and appeal was allowed in appellant's favor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
