Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision allowing the deduction of interest expenditure while computing LTCG on sale of a building, treating it as part of the cost of acquisition. This was based on the Delhi HC judgment in Mithlesh Kumari's case. The ITAT noted the proposed amendment in Sec 48 from AY 2024-25 disallowing such interest deduction, clarifying the existing legal position permitting it. Hence, no interference was warranted in the CIT(A)'s order.
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision allowing the deduction of interest expenditure while computing LTCG on sale of a building, treating it as part of the cost of acquisition. This was based on the Delhi HC judgment in Mithlesh Kumari's case. The ITAT noted the proposed amendment in Sec 48 from AY 2024-25 disallowing such interest deduction, clarifying the existing legal position permitting it. Hence, no interference was warranted in the CIT(A)'s order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
