Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
Assessee declared cash deposit of Rs. 42 lacs during demonetization period as income. AO made another addition u/s 69A for same amount, treating it as unexplained money and levied tax u/s 115BBE, resulting in double taxation of same income. ITAT held that AO's action of making addition over and above income declared by assessee is wrong and against provisions of Act. Since assessee had already offered cash deposit as income, no separate addition could be made. Appeal allowed.
Assessee declared cash deposit of Rs. 42 lacs during demonetization period as income. AO made another addition u/s 69A for same amount, treating it as unexplained money and levied tax u/s 115BBE, resulting in double taxation of same income. ITAT held that AO's action of making addition over and above income declared by assessee is wrong and against provisions of Act. Since assessee had already offered cash deposit as income, no separate addition could be made. Appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
