Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
The ITAT held that the assessee correctly computed the disallowable amounts for excess provision for bad debts written back and excess warranty provision. Despite the assessee providing relevant details to the AO, the CPC erroneously made adjustments. Considering the actual warranty expenses incurred and customer-wise breakup of bad debts written back, primarily from reputed companies like Tata Motors Ltd. and Ashok Leyland Ltd., the ITAT found the assessee's claim justified. Consequently, the ITAT set aside the CIT(A)'s findings, deleted the disallowances u/s 37, and allowed the assessee's grounds.
The ITAT held that the assessee correctly computed the disallowable amounts for excess provision for bad debts written back and excess warranty provision. Despite the assessee providing relevant details to the AO, the CPC erroneously made adjustments. Considering the actual warranty expenses incurred and customer-wise breakup of bad debts written back, primarily from reputed companies like Tata Motors Ltd. and Ashok Leyland Ltd., the ITAT found the assessee's claim justified. Consequently, the ITAT set aside the CIT(A)'s findings, deleted the disallowances u/s 37, and allowed the assessee's grounds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
