Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The ITAT held that the assessee correctly computed the disallowable amounts for excess provision for bad debts written back and excess warranty provision. Despite the assessee providing relevant details to the AO, the CPC erroneously made adjustments. Considering the actual warranty expenses incurred and customer-wise breakup of bad debts written back, primarily from reputed companies like Tata Motors Ltd. and Ashok Leyland Ltd., the ITAT found the assessee's claim justified. Consequently, the ITAT set aside the CIT(A)'s findings, deleted the disallowances u/s 37, and allowed the assessee's grounds.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
