Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 96136 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The AT upheld FMC's jurisdiction to conduct inquiry into affairs of NMCE and its key management personnel to protect investors' interests. It found payment of Rs. 28.8 crore by NMCE to ATSPL for software development bogus, amounting to embezzlement. Allotment of NMCE shares to appellant No. 2 without following due process was held illegal. Appointment of 144 consultants without due diligence and misappropriation of NMCE funds of over Rs. 60 lakh for personal expenses by appellant No. 1 and family were also upheld as irregularities. The appeals were dismissed.
The AT upheld FMC's jurisdiction to conduct inquiry into affairs of NMCE and its key management personnel to protect investors' interests. It found payment of Rs. 28.8 crore by NMCE to ATSPL for software development bogus, amounting to embezzlement. Allotment of NMCE shares to appellant No. 2 without following due process was held illegal. Appointment of 144 consultants without due diligence and misappropriation of NMCE funds of over Rs. 60 lakh for personal expenses by appellant No. 1 and family were also upheld as irregularities. The appeals were dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
