Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 96136 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
IL&FS, the debenture trustee, failed to report to SEBI that there were more than 49 investors in the non-convertible debentures issued by Vaishnodevi Dairy Products Ltd., despite receiving communication from Karvy on April 1, 2014, listing 154 investors. This violated Regulation 15(1)(i) of the SEBI (Debenture Trustees) Regulations, 1993. The AT upheld the penalty of Rs. 5 lakhs imposed u/s 15HB of the SEBI Act, 1992, for the first charge but set aside the second charge of suppressing the BENPOS report.
IL&FS, the debenture trustee, failed to report to SEBI that there were more than 49 investors in the non-convertible debentures issued by Vaishnodevi Dairy Products Ltd., despite receiving communication from Karvy on April 1, 2014, listing 154 investors. This violated Regulation 15(1)(i) of the SEBI (Debenture Trustees) Regulations, 1993. The AT upheld the penalty of Rs. 5 lakhs imposed u/s 15HB of the SEBI Act, 1992, for the first charge but set aside the second charge of suppressing the BENPOS report.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.