Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer is required to issue a draft assessment order u/s 144C in cases where there is a variation to the returned income on account of arm's length price adjustments for international or specified domestic transactions, as proposed by the Transfer Pricing Officer. Additionally, for non-resident assessees (other than companies), the Assessing Officer must comply with Section 144C from April 1, 2020, if any variation prejudicial to the assessee's interest is proposed. The Tribunal quashed the final assessment order passed without issuing a draft order as mandated by Section 144C(1), following the Delhi High Court's decision in Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs Sumitomo Corporation India (P.) Ltd.
The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer is required to issue a draft assessment order u/s 144C in cases where there is a variation to the returned income on account of arm's length price adjustments for international or specified domestic transactions, as proposed by the Transfer Pricing Officer. Additionally, for non-resident assessees (other than companies), the Assessing Officer must comply with Section 144C from April 1, 2020, if any variation prejudicial to the assessee's interest is proposed. The Tribunal quashed the final assessment order passed without issuing a draft order as mandated by Section 144C(1), following the Delhi High Court's decision in Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs Sumitomo Corporation India (P.) Ltd.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
