TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The NCLAT dismissed the appeal, holding that the Resolution Plan submitted by the Resolution Applicant did not violate any provisions of law, including Regulation 37(ba) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016. The Tribunal ruled that Regulation 37 requires the Resolution Plan to provide measures as necessary, including but not limited to those enumerated in clauses (a) to (m). Clause (ba) pertains to restructuring through merger, amalgamation, or demerger, which is required only when necessary for insolvency resolution. The NCLAT upheld the commercial wisdom of the Committee of Creditors in approving the Resolution Plan, stating that the Adjudicating Authority lacks jurisdiction to analyze or evaluate such commercial decisions unless the Plan violates Section 30(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
