Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Charitable institution invested funds in shares of joint venture companies, violating Section 13(1)(d). Exemption u/s 11 denied for income from such investment. However, only income from violative investment liable to tax, not entire income. Legislature did not intend denial of Section 11 exemption for entire income. View supported by Bombay and Delhi High Court judgments. Investment by assessee in joint venture companies constituted investment in violation of Section 13(1)(d), disentitling exemption u/s 11 for income from such investment only.
Charitable institution invested funds in shares of joint venture companies, violating Section 13(1)(d). Exemption u/s 11 denied for income from such investment. However, only income from violative investment liable to tax, not entire income. Legislature did not intend denial of Section 11 exemption for entire income. View supported by Bombay and Delhi High Court judgments. Investment by assessee in joint venture companies constituted investment in violation of Section 13(1)(d), disentitling exemption u/s 11 for income from such investment only.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
