Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of This case pertains to the pendency of appeals before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the initiation of recovery proceedings by the Income Tax Department for outstanding demands. The High Court expressed disappointment with the respondents for not addressing the issue of pendency despite specific directions. The Court observed that if the respondents are not interested in resolving the issue by classifying appeals based on recurring or covered issues, no recovery should be made from assessees during the pendency of appeals. Consequently, the Court ordered a stay on recovery of outstanding dues from petitioners whose appeals are pending until the disposal of these petitions.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
