Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Penalty levied u/s 271FA for delay in filing Statement of Financial Transactions (SFT) was challenged. The assessee delayed 255 days in complying with Section 285BA, citing unawareness of SFT filing requirement and technical issues with the income tax portal. Following previous ITAT decisions in similar cases, it was held that the breach was a technical or venial breach arising from bona fide ignorance. Considering the assessee's explanation of lack of knowledge and the fact that only one transaction was reported, the penalty u/s 271FA was deleted, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
