Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Cash withdrawals from ICICI and SBI bank accounts were treated as the source for deposits made during demonetization, as evidence showed the withdrawn funds were not used for other purposes. The burden of disproving availability of withdrawn cash for deposits lies with the Department. However, the claim of deposits originating from USD conversion was rejected due to lack of forex receipts and documentation from authorized money exchangers. As a result, an addition of Rs. 3,70,000/- was sustained u/s 69A for unexplained income. The penalty u/s 271AAC and interest u/ss 234A, 234B, and 234C will be recomputed based on the revised assessed income by the Assessing Officer. The Appellate Tribunal's decision was based on judicial precedents and evidentiary requirements for regulated foreign exchange transactions.
Cash withdrawals from ICICI and SBI bank accounts were treated as the source for deposits made during demonetization, as evidence showed the withdrawn funds were not used for other purposes. The burden of disproving availability of withdrawn cash for deposits lies with the Department. However, the claim of deposits originating from USD conversion was rejected due to lack of forex receipts and documentation from authorized money exchangers. As a result, an addition of Rs. 3,70,000/- was sustained u/s 69A for unexplained income. The penalty u/s 271AAC and interest u/ss 234A, 234B, and 234C will be recomputed based on the revised assessed income by the Assessing Officer. The Appellate Tribunal's decision was based on judicial precedents and evidentiary requirements for regulated foreign exchange transactions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
