Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Disallowance of sales commission paid to two Associated Enterprises (AEs) being foreign entities - assessee failed to discharge the onus of proving legitimate business requirement and genuineness of payment by submitting relevant documentary proof. CIT(A) deleted the addition without calling for a remand report from the AO, violating Rule 46A. Matter needs to be restored to CIT(A) for adjudicating sales commission again. Sales commission paid to Heubach GMBH - assessee discharged onus, Revenue failed to provide cogent material to disallow, CIT(A)'s order upheld. Sales commission paid to Darlington Enterprises - assessee discharged onus, Revenue failed to provide cogent material to disallow, CIT(A)'s order upheld. Undervaluation of finished/closing stock of Beta Blue - assessee applied weighted average cost method of yearly costs for finished stock and monthly costs for WIP. AS-2 requires fairest approximation of cost incurred. Matter set aside to AO to determine reasons for adopting different methods and allow assessee to justify, after verifying consistent practice and Revenue's acceptance.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
