Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Writ petition challenging adjudication order for recovery of inadmissible income tax return with interest and penalty. Court found non-application of mind and violation of principles of natural justice in the adjudication order as it failed to consider relevant documents. Writ petition dismissed solely on grounds of availability of alternate remedy, without examining merits. Court held preliminary ground raised by assessee in challenging adjudication order would not involve adjudication into facts, and writ court can examine effect of earlier order and subsequent proceedings on same set of facts. Writ petition restored for fresh hearing after affidavit-in-opposition filed by Department. Appeal allowed.
Writ petition challenging adjudication order for recovery of inadmissible income tax return with interest and penalty. Court found non-application of mind and violation of principles of natural justice in the adjudication order as it failed to consider relevant documents. Writ petition dismissed solely on grounds of availability of alternate remedy, without examining merits. Court held preliminary ground raised by assessee in challenging adjudication order would not involve adjudication into facts, and writ court can examine effect of earlier order and subsequent proceedings on same set of facts. Writ petition restored for fresh hearing after affidavit-in-opposition filed by Department. Appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
