Appellate enhancement limits protect against new income sources, while documented credits and prior-year investments resist unexplained-income additio...
Capital-gains exemption for charitable trusts extends to qualifying fixed deposits, while unrecoverable TDS write-offs may constitute income applicati...
Page of 4868
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 97344 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 80P deduction claim filed in a return submitted in response to notice u/s 142(1) is valid. The Income Tax Act does not mandate that the return must be filed u/ss 139(1), 139(4), or 139(5) for Section 80P deduction eligibility. Section 80A(5) only requires the claim to be made in a valid return of income filed by the assessee. A return filed in response to Section 142(1) notice is a valid return. The Kerala High Court in Chirakkal Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. case held that a return filed u/s 142(1) is valid for Section 80P deduction claim u/s 80A(5). Denying Section 80P deduction to the assessee who filed the return in response to Section 142(1) notice is incorrect.
Section 80P deduction claim filed in a return submitted in response to notice u/s 142(1) is valid. The Income Tax Act does not mandate that the return must be filed u/ss 139(1), 139(4), or 139(5) for Section 80P deduction eligibility. Section 80A(5) only requires the claim to be made in a valid return of income filed by the assessee. A return filed in response to Section 142(1) notice is a valid return. The Kerala High Court in Chirakkal Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. case held that a return filed u/s 142(1) is valid for Section 80P deduction claim u/s 80A(5). Denying Section 80P deduction to the assessee who filed the return in response to Section 142(1) notice is incorrect.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
