Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of This case deals with the applicability of Section 153, the limitation provision, to proceedings u/s 144C of the Income Tax Act. The key issues are whether the 11-month period envisaged u/s 144C should be in addition to the time limit prescribed u/s 153(1) read with Section 153(4), or whether it needs to be subsumed within the timelines stipulated u/s 153. The High Court observed that the Supreme Court is currently considering this issue arising from decisions of various High Courts, including the present case. The Revenue has issued circulars seeking adjournments in pending cases involving this issue before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, awaiting the Supreme Court's decision. Regarding interim relief, the High Court noted that assessees in similar cases have succeeded before the Madras and Delhi High Courts, and the Supreme Court has not stayed those orders setting aside the assessment orders. Consequently, the High Court continued the ad-interim order dated 28 June 2024 till the final disposal of this petition.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
