Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Bail was procured through misrepresentation and suppression of material facts by the applicant, who failed to disclose criminal history and prior conviction in a similar case. Despite objections raised in the first bail application, the applicant withdrew it and filed a second application without disclosing the material facts. The court held that economic offenses are serious, and the sessions judge rightly canceled the bail and examined the merits of the case due to the seriousness of allegations. The applicant's conduct of seeking regular bail without disclosing material facts justified cancellation of bail. The high court dismissed the application u/s 482 of CrPC, finding no merit in the arguments against cancellation of bail.
Bail was procured through misrepresentation and suppression of material facts by the applicant, who failed to disclose criminal history and prior conviction in a similar case. Despite objections raised in the first bail application, the applicant withdrew it and filed a second application without disclosing the material facts. The court held that economic offenses are serious, and the sessions judge rightly canceled the bail and examined the merits of the case due to the seriousness of allegations. The applicant's conduct of seeking regular bail without disclosing material facts justified cancellation of bail. The high court dismissed the application u/s 482 of CrPC, finding no merit in the arguments against cancellation of bail.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
