Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Valuation of imported goods was rejected by authorities, enhancing value based on contemporaneous import data of similar goods. However, transaction value declared by appellant was determinable u/s 14 of Customs Act, 1962, read with Rule 3(1) of Valuation Rules. Rejecting declared transaction value without legal sanction is unsustainable. NIDB data alone cannot justify value enhancement, as it merely serves as a guideline unless value falls within parameters of identical or similar goods. Rejection of transaction value and value enhancement by department are unsustainable. Impugned orders set aside. Appeal allowed.
Valuation of imported goods was rejected by authorities, enhancing value based on contemporaneous import data of similar goods. However, transaction value declared by appellant was determinable u/s 14 of Customs Act, 1962, read with Rule 3(1) of Valuation Rules. Rejecting declared transaction value without legal sanction is unsustainable. NIDB data alone cannot justify value enhancement, as it merely serves as a guideline unless value falls within parameters of identical or similar goods. Rejection of transaction value and value enhancement by department are unsustainable. Impugned orders set aside. Appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
