PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
In a case involving the imposition of a redemption fine and penalty, the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that when goods are allowed for re-export, the adjudicating authorities do not have the power to impose any redemption fine, citing the precedent of HCL Hewlett Packard Ltd. versus Collector of Customs, Delhi. Consequently, the redemption fine imposed on the appellant was set aside. Regarding the penalty, the Tribunal found it to be excessive and reduced it to Rs. 1,00,000/-. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.
In a case involving the imposition of a redemption fine and penalty, the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that when goods are allowed for re-export, the adjudicating authorities do not have the power to impose any redemption fine, citing the precedent of HCL Hewlett Packard Ltd. versus Collector of Customs, Delhi. Consequently, the redemption fine imposed on the appellant was set aside. Regarding the penalty, the Tribunal found it to be excessive and reduced it to Rs. 1,00,000/-. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
