Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
Insolvency and BankruptcyAugust 3, 2024Case LawsHC
The dispute arose between the parties regarding non-payment of rent. As per the agreement, the matter reached the Arbitrator, who allowed the petitioner/landlord's claim and directed recovery of a sum along with GST, interest, and other expenses. The petitioner claimed to have secured keys from security guards, while the respondent denied having any security guard. A criminal case was registered, and an application was filed on 17-10-2023. The vacation Court heard the matter and passed an order on 18-10-2023 after considering objections. The order stayed the Arbitrator's award, subject to the respondent furnishing a security deposit covering 5% of the award amount and granted a temporary injunction restraining the petitioner from disturbing the respondent's peaceful possession. The petitioner argued that the Court passed the order in a hurry, but the High Court dismissed the petition.
The dispute arose between the parties regarding non-payment of rent. As per the agreement, the matter reached the Arbitrator, who allowed the petitioner/landlord's claim and directed recovery of a sum along with GST, interest, and other expenses. The petitioner claimed to have secured keys from security guards, while the respondent denied having any security guard. A criminal case was registered, and an application was filed on 17-10-2023. The vacation Court heard the matter and passed an order on 18-10-2023 after considering objections. The order stayed the Arbitrator's award, subject to the respondent furnishing a security deposit covering 5% of the award amount and granted a temporary injunction restraining the petitioner from disturbing the respondent's peaceful possession. The petitioner argued that the Court passed the order in a hurry, but the High Court dismissed the petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
