Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Annual letting value (ALV) of unsold residential units treated as stock-in-trade was added as income from house property. CIT(A) deleted the addition. High Court affirmed ALV addition in assessee's own case for earlier years. Supreme Court upheld High Court's view. CIT(A)'s deletion cannot be sustained. Issue of taxability of vacant lands restored to AO for verification. Regarding allocation of expenses for computing deduction u/s 80IB(10), CIT(A) rightly allocated advertisement expenses based on average of earlier years and allocated directors' meeting fees as no evidence showed no agenda related to eligible projects. CIT(A) correctly did not allocate interest on borrowed funds as projects were running in surplus. Setting off of losses against profits correctly allowed as losses already set off earlier cannot be notionally brought forward. Disallowance u/s 14A rightly deleted as no evidence of investments from borrowed funds or expenditure for earning exempt income. Allocation of retainership fees upheld in absence of evidence of non-rendering of services for eligible projects.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
