Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Pursuant to the Supreme Court decisions in Commissioner of Customs, Chennai v. M/s. Denso Kirloskar Industries Pvt Ltd. and Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai v. M/s. Hindalco Industries Ltd., charges can be included in the assessable value only if established as a condition of sale and not related to post-importation activities. In the present case, neither the contract nor the impugned order identified procurement of licenses for process know-how or supervision of erection and commissioning as conditions of sale. Moreover, the license fee related to the manufacturing process, a post-importation activity. Since these activities were clearly post-importation and not conditions of sale, the charges paid cannot form part of the assessable value of the goods. Consequently, the impugned order cannot be sustained, and the appeal is allowed.
Pursuant to the Supreme Court decisions in Commissioner of Customs, Chennai v. M/s. Denso Kirloskar Industries Pvt Ltd. and Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai v. M/s. Hindalco Industries Ltd., charges can be included in the assessable value only if established as a condition of sale and not related to post-importation activities. In the present case, neither the contract nor the impugned order identified procurement of licenses for process know-how or supervision of erection and commissioning as conditions of sale. Moreover, the license fee related to the manufacturing process, a post-importation activity. Since these activities were clearly post-importation and not conditions of sale, the charges paid cannot form part of the assessable value of the goods. Consequently, the impugned order cannot be sustained, and the appeal is allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
