Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Jurisdiction assumed by DCIT not challenged within stipulated period, hence cannot be questioned now. Addition u/s 68 not sustainable as summary of receipts discloses names, addresses, and telephone numbers of donors with specific directions for contributions. Matter remanded to verify authenticity of summary receipts and copies of receipts issued. Notice u/s 143(2) issued prior to intimation u/s 143(1) valid as per Supreme Court ruling in CIT vs. Gujarat Electricity Board case, where processing u/s 143(1) subsequent to notice u/s 143(2) does not invalidate the notice.
Jurisdiction assumed by DCIT not challenged within stipulated period, hence cannot be questioned now. Addition u/s 68 not sustainable as summary of receipts discloses names, addresses, and telephone numbers of donors with specific directions for contributions. Matter remanded to verify authenticity of summary receipts and copies of receipts issued. Notice u/s 143(2) issued prior to intimation u/s 143(1) valid as per Supreme Court ruling in CIT vs. Gujarat Electricity Board case, where processing u/s 143(1) subsequent to notice u/s 143(2) does not invalidate the notice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
