Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
Transfer of use of goods with retention of possession and effective control is taxable as Supply of Tangible Goods (STGU) under service tax, not VAT on deemed sale. Appellant's agreement clauses retained effective control and possession of cranes given on hire, thus transaction was STGU despite VAT clause. Non-registration and payment of VAT instead of service tax amounted to misrepresentation and suppression, justifying extended period of limitation. Appeal against service tax demand dismissed by Appellate Tribunal.
Transfer of use of goods with retention of possession and effective control is taxable as Supply of Tangible Goods (STGU) under service tax, not VAT on deemed sale. Appellant's agreement clauses retained effective control and possession of cranes given on hire, thus transaction was STGU despite VAT clause. Non-registration and payment of VAT instead of service tax amounted to misrepresentation and suppression, justifying extended period of limitation. Appeal against service tax demand dismissed by Appellate Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
