Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Deduction u/s 35(1)(ii) disallowed by AO based on Investigation Wing's report alleging bogus donations receipts issued by institutions. ITAT held AO did not make independent inquiry to prove applicability of Investigation Wing's view to assessee. No material brought to disprove assessee's evidence regarding donations paid. No proof of cheque amount being ploughed back as cash to assessee. Subsequent withdrawal of recognition u/s 35(1)(ii) not a bar for allowing deduction for earlier donations. Assessee's claim u/s 35(1)(ii) allowed for both years. Assessee appeal allowed.
Deduction u/s 35(1)(ii) disallowed by AO based on Investigation Wing's report alleging bogus donations receipts issued by institutions. ITAT held AO did not make independent inquiry to prove applicability of Investigation Wing's view to assessee. No material brought to disprove assessee's evidence regarding donations paid. No proof of cheque amount being ploughed back as cash to assessee. Subsequent withdrawal of recognition u/s 35(1)(ii) not a bar for allowing deduction for earlier donations. Assessee's claim u/s 35(1)(ii) allowed for both years. Assessee appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
