Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Shares allotted at premium based on valuation report following DCF method. AO rejected report without pointing errors. ITAT held valuation not an exact science, cannot be done with arithmetic precision. Shares subscribed by outside investor, a reputed corporate group, not a related party. Hence, no infirmity in CIT(A) order deleting addition u/s 56(2)(viib). Disallowance u/s 36(1)(iii) on interest expenditure deleted by CIT(A) as zero coupon debentures were consideration for transfer of assets, not investment. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s view. Interest-free deposit given had sufficient own funds, no disallowance u/s 36(1)(iii) warranted as per Bombay High Court ruling. Assessee's appeal allowed on this issue.
Shares allotted at premium based on valuation report following DCF method. AO rejected report without pointing errors. ITAT held valuation not an exact science, cannot be done with arithmetic precision. Shares subscribed by outside investor, a reputed corporate group, not a related party. Hence, no infirmity in CIT(A) order deleting addition u/s 56(2)(viib). Disallowance u/s 36(1)(iii) on interest expenditure deleted by CIT(A) as zero coupon debentures were consideration for transfer of assets, not investment. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s view. Interest-free deposit given had sufficient own funds, no disallowance u/s 36(1)(iii) warranted as per Bombay High Court ruling. Assessee's appeal allowed on this issue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
