Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Impugned show cause notice for shortfall in service tax payment based on Rule 5(1) of Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 quashed as ultra vires Section 67 of Finance Act, 1994. Supreme Court held Rule 5 and Rule 2(c) of Rules, 2006 cannot include reimbursable expenses in taxable value prior to amendment of Section 67 by Finance Act, 2015 with effect from May 14, 2015. Show cause notice pertaining to period before May 13, 2015 contrary to Supreme Court decision, hence quashed being without jurisdiction.
Impugned show cause notice for shortfall in service tax payment based on Rule 5(1) of Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 quashed as ultra vires Section 67 of Finance Act, 1994. Supreme Court held Rule 5 and Rule 2(c) of Rules, 2006 cannot include reimbursable expenses in taxable value prior to amendment of Section 67 by Finance Act, 2015 with effect from May 14, 2015. Show cause notice pertaining to period before May 13, 2015 contrary to Supreme Court decision, hence quashed being without jurisdiction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
