Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Corporate debtor failed to repay operational creditors' dues, leading to initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The issue pertained to the effect of a winding-up petition filed by the appellant on the limitation period. The NCLAT held that the limitation period would not be halted due to the High Court's order on the winding-up petition, as the appellant failed to seek the Central Government's consent to pursue recovery against the respondent, despite being granted liberty. The NCLAT found no error in the impugned order and dismissed the appeal, upholding the Adjudicating Authority's decision that ample time was available for the appellant to seek the required consent.
Corporate debtor failed to repay operational creditors' dues, leading to initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The issue pertained to the effect of a winding-up petition filed by the appellant on the limitation period. The NCLAT held that the limitation period would not be halted due to the High Court's order on the winding-up petition, as the appellant failed to seek the Central Government's consent to pursue recovery against the respondent, despite being granted liberty. The NCLAT found no error in the impugned order and dismissed the appeal, upholding the Adjudicating Authority's decision that ample time was available for the appellant to seek the required consent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.