Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The Appellate Tribunal considered whether the sale proceeds of residential units should be treated as capital gains or business receipts. It was found that the transactions were part of a land transfer for development by a builder, not a business activity by the assessee. The long-term capital gain from the land transfer was eligible for exemption u/s 54F as the proceeds were reinvested in residential flats. Flats sold within 36 months attracted short-term capital gain, while those held longer qualified for long-term capital gain benefit u/s 54. The Tribunal upheld the decision that the transactions were capital gains, not business receipts, and dismissed the revenue's appeals. Additionally, the valuation report supported the assessee's investment in constructing Rupam Tower, showing no basis for the excessive addition by the Assessing Officer, leading to the deletion of the alleged unaccounted investment.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
