Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Approved resolution plans extinguish unsubmitted pre-approval tax claims, preventing later recovery outside the insolvency process and preserving a cl...
Transfer pricing comparability requires functional alignment and permits working capital adjustment, while APA margins cannot govern non-covered years...
Treaty benefit, goodwill depreciation and hedging costs: export commission disallowed, while key business deductions and depreciation claims succeeded...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95714 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The High Court examined the maintainability of a petition challenging the cancellation of GST registration, considering alternative remedy u/s 30 of GST Act. The petitioner alleged violation of natural justice and infringement of Constitutional rights u/s 19 and 21. Citing WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION case, the court noted exceptions for writ petitions when fundamental rights or natural justice are at stake. The show cause notice indicated alleged irregularities, but the petitioner did not utilize the available remedy. Despite dismissing the petition, the court allowed the petitioner to challenge the cancellation through proper channels u/s 30 of GST Act or by filing an appeal within a reasonable time.
The High Court examined the maintainability of a petition challenging the cancellation of GST registration, considering alternative remedy u/s 30 of GST Act. The petitioner alleged violation of natural justice and infringement of Constitutional rights u/s 19 and 21. Citing WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION case, the court noted exceptions for writ petitions when fundamental rights or natural justice are at stake. The show cause notice indicated alleged irregularities, but the petitioner did not utilize the available remedy. Despite dismissing the petition, the court allowed the petitioner to challenge the cancellation through proper channels u/s 30 of GST Act or by filing an appeal within a reasonable time.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.