Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The ITAT held that an agreement to purchase cannot be considered a purchase deed u/s 54F for LTCG deduction. Citing Suraj Lamp case, it clarified SA/GPA/WILL transactions are not transfers. Possession alone does not establish title. As the sale deed was not executed, the exemption u/s 54F was denied as conditions were unmet. The CIT(A) and AO's decision was upheld, emphasizing the need for registered documents to fulfill statutory requirements for claiming exemptions. The appeal was dismissed due to non-compliance with legal provisions.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
