Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
The Appellate Tribunal held that the assessment u/s 147 was invalid as no addition was made for the issue recorded in the reasons u/s 148(2). The AO's addition u/s 69C for bogus purchases was deemed wrong as the assessee had disclosed total purchases with explained sources. The Tribunal quashed the assessment u/s 143(3) u/s 147 as without jurisdiction. The appeal of the assessee was allowed.