Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The ITAT held that the assessee failed to provide a satisfactory explanation regarding unexplained loan transactions/advances to a director. The AO made an addition to the company's income due to lack of clarity on the source of the loan. However, the assessee presented confirmation copies of refunds received through account payee cheques from the individuals in question, who are income tax assessees with PAN. The AO did not utilize powers u/s 133(6) to verify the transactions, despite the assessee's request. The assessee fulfilled the burden of proof by submitting PAN and confirmation of the individuals. Citing Orissa Corporation Pvt. Ltd., it was emphasized that without issuing summons u/s 131, no adverse inference can be drawn. Consequently, the addition made by the AO was deemed unjustified, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
The ITAT held that the assessee failed to provide a satisfactory explanation regarding unexplained loan transactions/advances to a director. The AO made an addition to the company's income due to lack of clarity on the source of the loan. However, the assessee presented confirmation copies of refunds received through account payee cheques from the individuals in question, who are income tax assessees with PAN. The AO did not utilize powers u/s 133(6) to verify the transactions, despite the assessee's request. The assessee fulfilled the burden of proof by submitting PAN and confirmation of the individuals. Citing Orissa Corporation Pvt. Ltd., it was emphasized that without issuing summons u/s 131, no adverse inference can be drawn. Consequently, the addition made by the AO was deemed unjustified, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.